Friday, January 27, 2017

A Lullabye for American Christendom, One Week After President Trump's Inauguration



My friends in American Christendom: Sleep well tonight.

Sleep soundly knowing that those who design to bring terror to your home have been barred from entry. Sleep peacefully knowing that you need not fear terrorists slipping in with the intent to destroy your way of life. Sleep securely knowing that the days of Muslim influence on our country are numbered.

(Do not worry about those whose slumber will be interrupted by the sound of bombs and gunfire. Do not be bothered about families here in our country who now have to wait four months before their loved ones back home can resume the process of getting to safety – if they are ever again allowed to come at all. Give no attention to the parents and children, brothers and sisters, who face destruction at the hands of the same terrorists that we fear.)

Sleep well knowing that order and safety shall soon return to your cities. Sleep peacefully knowing that the dangerous illegal immigrants who abuse our system and prey on the innocent will soon be rooted out. Sleep securely knowing that our laws will once again be respected and abided.

(Do not worry about those whose slumber will be interrupted by the fear of what might happen on their daily commute or a routine errand run. Do not be bothered about the citizens who fear additional scrutiny and possible targeting due to their physical appearance or language of conversation. Give no attention to the parents and children, brothers and sisters, who may experience their homes torn apart after contributing to their neighborhoods and communities for years.)

Sleep well knowing that life is winning in America again. Sleep peacefully knowing that pro-life judges will be coming to our Supreme Court. Sleep securely knowing that the innocent unborn will no longer be killed.

(Do not worry about those whose slumber will be interrupted by the persistent fear that life will forever be disrupted. Do not be bothered about the actions of our leaders that lead to abuse and demoralization. Give no attention to the parents and children, brothers and sisters – the innocent living – who may literally not make it out of this alive.)

Sleep well knowing that you are safe in God’s hands. Sleep peacefully knowing that you are saved by grace, through faith in Christ Jesus. Sleep securely knowing that you will be in God’s presence one day.

(Do not worry about the biblical admonitions of prophets and apostles. Do not fret over the reality that faith without works is dead. Give no attention to the example of those dismissed by the Father’s left hand, protesting, “Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not take care of you?...”)



Sleep well tonight.


Wednesday, November 9, 2016

at school after the election


I am a middle school teacher, and like many of my colleagues, I woke up this morning (the Boxing Day of presidential elections) dreading what I would say to my kids when they inevitably brought up the election. Well, surprise, surprise, the election was indeed a big conversation point as the kids came into class today. Several of them shouted angry, bitter things about Donald Trump; I held up my hand and told them that kind of talk about anyone will not be tolerated in my classroom. We then chatted a bit about the logistics behind the election (when will Trump take office, how long is a president’s term and how many times can he or she be re-elected, what are electoral votes, etc.).


They asked me who I voted for and I declined to tell them. I did, however, tell them this:


  • The next presidential election will be in 2020, and you’ll barely still be too young to vote. The next election after that will be in 2024, when you’re in your early twenties, and from that point on it’s your right. Pay close attention to what happens in our country between now and then and be ready to vote when your time comes.

  • One of the biggest groups of people that helped decide this election was voters without a college education. We tell you kids all the time that it’s important to take school seriously and get a college degree. Part of the reason behind that is so you can hopefully make informed decisions on voting day. Stay in school.

  • Hopefully you remember from 5th Grade Social Studies that our government is based on balance of power. Just because a president says he or she wants to do something doesn’t mean it will happen. You’re going to vote for a lot of people besides the president, from the people who lead your city to your national representatives; make sure you make informed decisions on those people, too.

  • [thinking specifically of the fact that over 90% of my kids are non-white and many of their parents are first or second generation immigrants] You're going to hear people say things that make you think (or let you know) they don't want you here. Please understand that many, many adults still want you here. I am one of them.

  • No matter what happens, we need to treat each other with respect and kindness. This was a really nasty election and a lot of people said really mean things about each other. You’re going to run into that in real life, whether in political discussions or just interacting with other kids at school. Make the choice to treat others with respect, and if they don’t give it back, be the bigger person and treat them with respect and kindness anyway.

  • What happened last night changes nothing that happens in our classroom on a daily basis, including today’s class. Who would like to read today’s Student Expectation posted on the board?...

Thursday, July 7, 2016

this was not abstract: concerning alton sterling, philando castile, etc


I just watched two videos I’d rather not have seen. If you’ve been paying attention to the news, you may already know what two videos I’m referring to. I’m going to link them below in their full gory, profanity-laced, violent forms. I can’t think of any rational person who’d willingly want to watch film of two men being killed, but I think this is important enough to make an exception.

When I was a pastor, I got called to be with a family as their matriarch passed away. She was hooked up to life support in ICU and after I arrived, we all gathered around and I prayed as they pulled the plug. I watched her die as her family around her cried. It was a sacred, powerful moment.

The moments captured in these videos are sacred, powerful moments as well, but they are sacred, powerful moments marred by inexcusable violence. These men were robbed of a peaceful end, of closure with family and friends.

Imagine if that was you in about thirty minutes. Alton Sterling and Philando Castile were equally oblivious to their impending deaths a half hour prior to the events. What thoughts go through the mind of someone like that lying on the sidewalk or slumped over in their car, covered in their blood, feeling intense pain as their final sensation? I can’t even fathom.

So here are the links. If you don't feel up to watching these videos, I don't blame you, because they are disturbing to say the least. But I do think it’s important that people bear witness to these men’s deaths, just as I bore witness to the death of a woman in a sterile, air-conditioned hospital room.


The death of Alton Sterling in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on July 5, 2016


The death of Philando Castile in Falcon Heights, Minnesota on July 6, 2016


As I watched these videos, the white noise from a baby monitor registered in the background. My two year old son is currently peacefully sleeping in his room, surrounded by stuffed animals, the soft whirr of a fan blowing over his little body in a gray sleep sack. Every ounce of me wants to sneak into that bedroom right now and cradle him, kiss his head, hold him tight to my chest. He’s small enough now that I can carry him without much effort, and affectionate enough that he invites cuddles and tickles and hugs.

Out of respect for his nap, I haven’t snuck in there (yet). So instead I’m sitting on my bed, tears streaming down my face, wiping my eyes so I can see the computer screen. I feel like I have to write these words now, while the horror is still raw.

You see, my son is small enough now that I can carry him when we cross parking lots or walk through crowds. His mom and I can choose what he’s allowed to eat and when he gets put down for bedtime and where we go during the day. But there’s going to be a day in the surprisingly-near future when he’s making those decisions for himself, and then he’ll be out with friends or a girlfriend or a spouse or his own kids, he’ll be driving himself, he’ll be running errands by himself. And I won’t be able to cradle him or protect him anymore.

And frankly, it seems those everyday things are going to be a lot more dangerous for him than they are for me. My son is mixed race, the child of a black mother and a white father. Maybe he looks white enough that he won’t be in danger, but maybe he won’t. (The fact that I even have to gauge that difference is perverse.)


I wrote on this subject years ago, before I even had a son. After Trayvon Martin was killed, I wrote a blog post where I took on some of these issues, and even framed it in terms of my relationship to my children one day. Now I do have a son, and I understand the depth of that fear for my kid’s safety to a degree I couldn’t have imagined before.

I remember my parents having a talk with me about the police when I was young. “If you’re pulled over, be respectful, show them your information, don’t argue. If something happens and you get taken in for something that you feel is wrong, just go along with the officers and we will come and we will help you sort it out.” The possibility of being shot did not come up in the conversation.

I’m going to have a talk with my son and whatever other children I have about the police one day, too. It’s not going to be so simple. It’s almost like trying to teach a script when you don’t know what play they’re going to have to perform. Should you explain your case, calmly? Should you simply be silent? Should you ask the office to clarify what he means if you’re not sure what he wants you to do? “Well, do your best, but you still might get shot. Sorry.”


I just hope you (and I) realize that these shootings are not abstract. These are concrete realities. These are real men (and women and boys and girls) dying when others probably would not have died.

These are not incidents confined to a particular area. Castile died in St. Paul, Minnesota. Sterling died in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Trayvon Martin died in Sanford, Florida. Michael Brown died in Ferguson, Missouri. Freddie Gray died in Baltimore, Maryland. Walter Scott died in North Charleston, South Carolina. Eric Garner died in Staten Island, New York. John Crawford died in Beavercreek, Ohio. Dante Parker died in Victorville, California. Rumain Brisbon died in Phoenix, Arizona. Sadly, the list goes on much longer, with many other locations across the USA.

These are also not incidents committed by unhinged racists. In the video of Castile’s shooting, a man who I assume is the officer that fired the shots can be heard frantically screaming profanity over and over after Castile’s girlfriend is taken out of the car. I don’t believe he was a vengeful racist out to kill a black man. But kill a black man he did – as have many other officers of various ethnic backgrounds, who probably have diverse perspectives and relationships with African-Americans and other minorities.

So clearly, the problem here is not to simply get rid of racist cops. These conversations inevitably have a backlash: “But most police officers are good cops trying to do their jobs! You try making that life-or-death decision in the blink of an eye!” Black Lives Matter spurred the reactionary Blue Lives Matter, as if the two are mutually exclusive. There, in that binary, lies the predicament – and it’s a predicament that has claimed the lives of many black people.

The real task is to reevaluate and challenge an entire system that promotes (deliberately or not) responses colored by race. I can almost guarantee you that if I was pulled over and told and officer, “Yes sir, I will get my ID to show you, but my wallet is in my back pocket and I have a legal concealed carry with me,” I’m probably not going to get shot.

The problem is not with the individual who is openly bigoted – the problem is seeing things tinted in a certain direction. I had a professor in seminary who was fond of the metaphor, “It’s the water we’re swimming in.” We (and by “we” I generally mean “typical white Americans”) don’t even realize the racism because we’re accustomed to it.

So maybe if we truly value our police officers and want to do right by them in these horrific situations, they need to be set free to choose not to shoot. They – as do we all – need new eyes to see and recognize danger and risk in a way that doesn’t result in a rate of black men killed by cops being five times higher than that of white men, as was the case in 2015.

No, I don’t know the solution. But I do think identifying and naming the problem is probably step one.


 And the fact of the matter is, I think I can understand those people who brush off these killings are overblown racially-charged nonsense.

If I didn’t have a black son, I wouldn’t be afraid when I think about him getting pulled over a police officer at some point in his life.

If I didn’t have black friends from seminary, I wouldn’t be seeing their heartbroken laments posted on Facebook every time something like this happens.

If we didn’t have a black babysitter (whose family is from Nigeria), I wouldn’t have had the experience of consoling her after she showed up a half hour late to our home because she got pulled over without being given a reason and had her car searched.

In short: if I didn’t know many black people, I might not take this seriously. And shame on me for that.


So I guess my biggest plea in writing this is for those of you that I know who may not have deep relationships with black people. You may not know many African-Americans, but if you’re reading this, you probably know me.

Please: Recognize the problem. Speak the names of the deceased. Acknowledge it when you see signs of this happening. Be open to the possibility that this isn’t just a sad string of events, but that there is a pattern, and that pattern needs to be broken.

And pray. To paraphrase the Apostle Paul, pray that the peace of God, which transcends all understanding, will guard our hearts and our minds in Christ Jesus. And to paraphrase the Prophet Amos, pray that justice will roll on like a river, and righteousness like a never-failing stream.

Friday, March 25, 2016

in the garden



(for Biblical reference see: Matthew / Mark / Luke / John / 1st Corinthians)


He prays in the garden by himself while he friends sleep a few yards away.

That’s not quite right. He isn’t “praying” exactly, in the sense that most people picture the practice.

His hands are not folded neatly before him, or pressed palms-together with his fingers pointed toward heaven, or even laid on his knees palms up as if ready to receive something.

He isn’t in the midst of a peaceful meditation, some Zen trance that calms the spirit.

He isn’t performing some memorized ritual, like the salah or even the very Lord’s Prayer that he himself orated in front of a crowd of intrigued onlookers.

He isn’t even articulating words, so much. He doesn’t mention his dear friends or his family members. He makes no reference to political powers pulling the strings in the world at large. He does not remember those in need: the hungry or the lonely or the sick or the victims of disaster. He makes no plea on behalf of lost souls. He doesn’t even give thanks for everyday blessings, the assurance of salvation, or everlasting divine love.


To use a bold word, his prayer is selfish. This is not to say that he is being vain. In this moment, he is concerned solely with his own very immediate needs and desires.

And the prayer comes out in grunts, wails, clinched fists tearing at his temples, body bent over in the fetal position, sweat, tears, bitter tears on blotchy red cheeks, stress so severe that his blood vessels give way under pressure and burst, blood running down his face, the appearance of injury before anyone has laid a hand on him or used a weapon against him.

He gasps, he struggles for air, he looks into the night sky and sees naught but stars.


Meanwhile, his friends sleep nearby in the garden. Can they really be blamed? They have been up for hours, listening to their rabbi giving confusing, contradictory, vague instructions. They have been accused of being ill-prepared and uncommitted, but about what, they aren’t really sure.

One of them is destined to be a traitor – just who, exactly? Did each of them say to himself, “Could it be me?”

And then they go into a garden and wait for some unknown event – but something that can’t be good.

At some point, weariness and frustration crumble under physical exhaustion, and sleep takes over.


And so he is alone. He is profoundly alone.

One biographer, named Luke, says an angel comes to give him strength, but Luke’s contemporary writers make no mention of the event. Even then, what bittersweet encouragement can the divine messenger provide? The man has begun choking out words, pleading, “Is there another way?”

Though angel comes to provide strength, he does not provide comfort. He effectively appears to deliver the message, “No.”

And so Jesus is in the garden, alone, and he cries out, “WHERE ARE YOU???”





I don’t know if my imagined depiction of Jesus in Gethsemane has much root in reality, but this image came into my mind as I sat in my church last evening participating in a Maundy Thursday service.

I grew up in a Christian home, attending church twice every Sunday and most Wednesdays. Even so, the Maundy Thursday celebration – a commemoration of Jesus and his disciples sharing a meal the night before his death – was foreign to me until at least my college years, maybe even later. Now I am part of church that celebrates many of the liturgical holidays (holy-days) and so my family and I went to a Maundy Thursday service.

The conclusion of this event was a new ritual for me, though.

The service began with the front altar and stage area adorned with white and gold decorations, but it concluded with all of the elements of décor – everything that seemed to designate the building as a sacred space – being stripped away.

As someone read the words of the 22nd Psalm - “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” – all of the vanity of the sanctuary was removed in a flurry of activity: tablecloths, candles, the oversized Bible on a stand, the elements of Communion. The pastor and acolytes even stripped off their white robes, revealing plain black secular clothing beneath.

The service concluded in a darkened room with nothing but a bare wooden table on stage – well, a table with a single embellishment in the form of a wooden cross brought out and laid on its side where the communion elements usually reside.

And so I pictured Jesus, after the Passover meal, after praying for himself and his followers, after months of teaching and praying and healing, in an hour of weakness and loneliness.

I have always thought of Good Friday as the most somber day in Christian practice, and certainly I still think it is. Last night, though, I realized the weight of Maundy Thursday, the night of betrayal, the night of a lonely prayer in a garden, the night of an unjust seizure and arrest.




Christians believe lots of weird things.

I don’t mean that there are Christians out there with weird and dangerous fringe ideas (although, yes, that is true).

I mean that when you really start looking at what the Bible seems to teach and what Church doctrine and tradition has preserved throughout the centuries, it gets pretty strange. It gets scandalous even.


I mean, when you look at the Bible, it usually reads like the main villains are good religious people.

Jesus gets into trouble with a group called the Pharisees more than anybody else, and they were like the equivalent of seminary-educated pastors in their day. The same is true for his followers after Jesus ascends into heaven.

And this isn’t just a New Testament thing – the Old Testament prophets are full of judgment and warning for people doing “good religious things” that have no bearing on how they treat others or live their daily lives.

So of course it’s going to be a scandalous book at times.


One of the stranger ideas in the Bible is articulated in the book of Hebrews: “For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin.”

That's a bombshell statement.

In Christian theology, Jesus is not merely the son of God; he is “Emmanuel,” “God with us.” He is literally God in human form.

So if we take the author of Hebrews at face value, that means God knows, from personal experience, what it means to feel mad, exhausted, confused, goofy, crabby, indignant, horny, moody, skeptical, smitten, depressed, furious, hangry, betrayed, offended, emasculated, joyous, ashamed, and so on and so on ad infinitum.

This also means that God knows what it feels like to be abandoned by God.


But that doesn’t make sense, does it? And if it is true, what good does that do us?



Speaking from personal experience, I have been through a rough several years. Without getting too far into the details, during that time I have lived in eight cities in four different states and worked five jobs (two of which I had hoped to be long-term career track jobs, plus the one I’m working now which I hope will stick). My son was born about two years ago, and while he is a source of great joy, having a kid is a landscape-shifting life event and source of significant transitional stress for anybody.

I have been emotionally and spiritually wounded in multiple separate incidents, and the most severe wounds have come at the hand of well-intentioned religious people – well-intentioned people of my own faith, at that. In return, I have been bitter and unkind in my thoughts toward those who have injured me.

I have been bitter and unkind in my thoughts toward God, as well.

In some lonely moments, I sort of feel like he deserves that response from me.

I haven’t teetered over the edge to rejecting my faith, but I’ve certainly entertained the idea, and on more than one occasion.


What good to me, then, is a crying, desperate, aggrieved Jesus choking out the words “Not my will but yours” in the Garden of Gethsemane? What good is a beaten, bloody, dying Jesus on a cross gasping the words “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” on a hill called The Skull outside of Jerusalem?

Somehow, that crude, violent image feels like salve on a burn.


That image of abandonment mixed with sincere fear and some odd mingling of doubtful thoughts and faithful action gives me encouragement.

The example of Jesus shows me that even in my most distant moments, at my most heretical and defiant, when all is noise and wind and fury I still have an advocate who understands how I feel.

I scream, “I don’t think you’re doing anything, God!” but he is not a silent mountain looming in the distance.

He is not an angry Roman deity holding a lightning bolt in his hand.

He simply comes silently and sits beside me and listens to me rant.

More than that, he sits with me in the awkward silence when I’m not even sure why I’m mad anymore.

Grace abounds even in the most quiet and lonely moments.


And this gives me hope when I feel hopeless, because if I can lament in the Garden of Gethsemane, maybe I too can share in the hope of the resurrection come Easter Sunday.


Saturday, November 28, 2015

"Abbott's slippery slope" / "Texas should still mean friendship": A Follow-Up


Monday of last week, I took a sick day. I had been looking after my ill toddler son over the weekend and he passed along his lovely germs to me, and I was home with a nasty cough and a sore throat. With nothing to do but sit around trying to stay hydrated and well-rested, I spent a good portion of the day reading the news.

That same day, Texas Governor Greg Abbott announced (along with numerous other American governors) that his state would no longer welcome refugees from Syria, citing security concerns in light of the terrorist attack in Paris. I ended up spending a good portion of my morning both sick and fuming.


So, with rare free time to sit and write, I did something I've never done before: I wrote down my thoughts in an essay geared for a newspaper audience. I then submitted it to the editorial boards at both The Houston Chronicle (my hometown paper) and The Austin American-Statesman (the paper of our state capital). I figured that if neither paper ran the essay, I'd post it here on my blog... and kind of assumed that's exactly what would happen.


Lo and behold...


To my pleasant surprise, both papers chose to post my essay on their websites. The Chronicle ran my essay on their online Outlook page under the name "Abbott's slippery slope", while the American-Statesman ran a more heavily edited version on their myStatesman page a day later under the name "Texas should still mean friendship". That was cool enough on its own, but I then discovered that the American-Statesman shared the link on their Facebook and Twitter, where people were commenting, sharing, and re-tweeting it.


Opinion: If Abbott — and the governors of other states taking similar stands — truly wants to be consistent, he needs to acknowledge that he made this decision out of fear.
Posted by Austin American-Statesman on Wednesday, November 18, 2015

As overwhelming as it felt to see my words posted on social media by two newspapers in major Texas cities, it was even more overwhelming to see the response on my Facebook, where a diverse cross-section of my Facebook friends - family members; friends from high school, college, and seminary; people from various churches I've called home over the years; etc. - commented with supportive words and "Likes", and several shared the article on their own Facebook walls. I was incredibly humbled by the kind words from so many, including more than a few people I haven't talked to personally in years. If you're reading this and you're one of those people, thank you very much.

I also recognize that more than a few people replied with kind comments even though they personally do not agree with my position on the Syrian refugee issue. Those compliments and supportive words were the most meaningful of all.


I looked through the comments on the American-Statesman's Facebook post and on the various shared posts of my article posted by my Facebook friends, plus I've of course been reading various perspectives across social media. I wanted to write a response to a few of the most common rebuttals and critiques of the position I put forth in my essay, and hope that my words hear will be received with grace and consideration - while also hoping I can be gracious and considerate to those with whom I disagree.

I will say this: I do not believe that Gov. Abbott and other politicians who oppose the admittance of Syrian refugees intend to be cruel or hateful. I believe they are motivated by a sincere and understandable desire to keep their citizens safe. However, I do still strongly believe that the unintended consequence of disallowing Syrian refugees would cause a great deal of pain, not only to refugees, but to people who stand for freedom worldwide.


Anyway, enough rambling. I present my response to three of the major critiques that I have read consistently online:


"As long as we have homeless veterans, hungry children, etc. here in the USA, we don’t have room to take in refugees."


I’ve seen this argument posted quite a few times in multiple variations. I do believe this particular push-back comes from a respectable place; however, I also think it is tremendously misguided.


Who agrees' with this meme?More Here: http://www.surenews.com/
Posted by Busted Locals on Tuesday, November 17, 2015



I cannot say that I understand the logic that says, “Because we’re not helping our own people, we can’t help others.” The underlying assumption argues that we don’t help veterans, orphans, and so on because we don’t have the ability to do so.

Superficially, this argument makes some sense. Much of my work experience took place in the realm of church ministry, and I’ve been party to more than one debate about overseas missions and international service projects. “Why are we sending people over there to do work and spending our money on those places when we have so much that needs to be done here?” is a question I’ve heard more than once. Truth be told, I’ve asked the question myself on more than one occasion. When allocating funds in the budget of a local church, asking for a significant portion of the incoming funds to be dedicated to international missions might be a bit much to ask.


But we’re talking about the scope of the whole of American society here. I don’t believe that welcoming refugees somehow prevents us from reaching out to Americans in need. Having worked on the donations end of a nonprofit that worked with the homeless in a major city, I would suggest that the only thing that prevents us from reaching out to Americans in need is, well, us.


I’ll get into this more later on in my post, but my strong belief is that the biggest impact on the refugee crisis will come from faith communities, nonprofits, and individuals and households who make the decision to do something to welcome refugees and help them. Perhaps you have a different passion: providing housing and healthcare for veterans in need; recruiting families to take in foster children and give them loving homes; fighting racial injustice and police corruption; equipping uneducated single moms to better provide for their families; and so on and so on with virtually countless possibilities.

If some other major point of need is your calling or the need closest to your heart, by all means, pour yourself into that and be blessed. But don’t stand in the way of others who have different passions than your own, and don't pretend that the need dearest to your heart needs to be satisfied before anyone else can work toward eliminating other points of hurt.


"Syrian refugees pose too much of a security risk."


This is the main thrust of Gov. Abbott’s reasoning, and I feel I've mostly said my piece on the subject in my original essay. I will, however, address an analogy I’ve read posted in a few different places by different people:

This analogy is beautifully worded, but fundamentally flawed. I lock and bolt the doors on my house at night to protect my family because I love them, but if I saw someone left beaten and bloody trying to pull herself up on my porch and quietly gasping for help, I'd like to believe that I’d unlock that door and usher her inside.

Of course, here comes the disconnect: Many assume that opening the door and letting in refugees compromises our own safety. They would argue that the vetting process for allowing in refugees (especially Syrians) needs to be re-evaluated and tweaked before allowing more of them in. I don’t believe this is true.


Others have responded to this argument more eloquently and with more informational basis than I could, so I will defer to others to further underscore the point. Two reading recommendations: this Facebook post from Scott Hicks, a pastor and former immigration lawyer, detailing the resettlement process from a legal perspective, and this Twitter post from Buljušmić-Kustura Arnesa, a Bosnian refugee to the USA, detailing the resettlement process from a personal perspective.


If you believe Syrians pose a threat to the US because you’re ignorant of the refugee process, that’s OK. I was ignorant to the process not that long ago, and I still have a lot to learn. Ignorance can be educated.

If you believe Syrians pose a threat to the US because you’ve learned about the refugee resettlement process and stubbornly chosen to believe that there’s either some conspiratorial flaw in the system or there’s something inherently sinister about Syrians and/or Arabs and/or Muslims, it may be time to do some soul-searching.


"We don’t have the resources, especially the money, to take in these people."


Upon re-reading my article as it was published in both the Chronicle and the American-Statesman, I became concerned that I did not adequately clarify one important piece of my opinion on the matter. If I could tell Gov. Abbott one thing to his face, I would hope the message would boil down to this: “Let them come.” Don’t close the door. Don’t unjustly single out one particular people of national origin.

Honestly, though, I don’t feel I am informed enough to speak too deeply about public policy or legislation. I do seriously doubt that ending refugee resettlement in the US would have any significant economic boon for our country, plus I would hope my tax dollars are being invested in (among other things) causes like refugee resettlement.

(Quick aside - if my final statement in that paragraph gives you pause, and you find yourself thinking of other things our tax dollars should be spent on, please refer back to the red-colored text at the end of my first section.)

But if refugee resettlement in the USA will be truly effective, it won’t primarily be because of the federal government. It’ll be because ordinary individuals and organizations become passionate about taking care of these people and put forth their time, money, and resources toward helping. In my opinion, the money quote from my essay came toward the end:

"If Texas truly wants to combat terrorism, be a good friend to our neighbors, and keep our own locals safe, we should open the doors and welcome refugees with loving arms. Churches and other faith communities, civic services and households should rise up and greet Syrians and others with hospitality and grace. As a people, we should show refugees and displaced peoples that there is hope for a better life and a better future, and that hope lies in the context of a free nation with a democratically elected secular government."

(Totally tangential aside: The Chronicle edited out my Oxford comma. Weird.)


My personal concern is primarily with what the individual citizen and local organizations are doing to serve refugees. When I first read Gov. Abbott’s statement on Syrian refugees, my knee-jerk thought was to write a letter to the governor’s office. After reflecting for a few hours, I changed my mind and decided to send a letter to a few newspapers.

My main reason was that I figured if my words could impact at least a few people on a personal level and move them to action, that would be a much more profound thing than sending off a letter to Austin that, in all likelihood, would at best be screened by an aide before it even came anywhere close to the governor's desk. Even if Gov. Abbott did read my letter, I'm still naïve enough to think that actions of common people working together can make a louder impact than a statement from a governor's office.


So, What Now?


To that end, I wanted to offer a few links to some different organizations that present opportunities to volunteer or give financially and take some tangible step toward helping refugees. This list is by no means exhaustive, and since I currently live in the Houston area and my article was catered to a Texan audience, these links are mostly connected to Texas, especially Houston.

Wherever you live, though, it is very likely that refugees who need help live in your area, and a quick Google search should yield some organizations working with refugee populations.


I also encourage the religious among you to initiate conversations at your church, mosque, synagogue, temple, ward, or so on, about whether anyone in your community would be willing to bond together and make some response to the problem. Amazing things can happen when faith gets translated into action.


Anyway, here's a list:


UNHCR: the UN's Refugee Resettlement Agency. They literally work confronting this issue all over the world, and most (if not all) of your local agencies will be connected with them on some level.

International Rescue Committee: This group is very near and dear to my heart because my wife and I volunteered with them in Salt Lake City, Utah. It was working with them that I learned much of what I now know about refugee resettlement, and where I had the opportunity to interact with refugees from many different countries. They don't have an office in Houston, but they do work in Abilene and Dallas, as well numerous other locations worldwide.

Houston-based agencies:
Interfaith Ministries
Partnership for the Advancement & Immersion of Refugees
Refugee Service of Texas (they also work in Amarillo, Austin, Ft. Worth, and Dallas)



I don't plan to write anything further on this topic, but then again, I didn't wake up one Monday morning intending to send an essay to the editorial boards of a few newspapers. Nonetheless, I welcome your comments (supportive or critical) and appreciate you taking the time to read my largely inconsequential words.


And one last request: If you're so inclined, set yourself an alarm or something that will sound off in about 15-18 months or so that says, "THERE ARE STILL REFUGEES IN NEED". I have no idea how long this issue is going to be a flashpoint in the media, but the real needs of refugees will be here for the long haul. These are people who are often largely invisible in mainstream society, and perhaps the silver lining of these events is that, for once, we have a widespread national and international conversation about refugees going on. Let's keep it going for a while longer...